Mr. Sansone et al, I wanted to bring something to your attention. It appears that there will be whistleblowers from within the intelligence community coming forward to expose the nanotech in the shots in 2024.
There is some very revealing language in the Intelligence Authorization Act for 2024. It's the legislation that finalizes the budget for the U.S. intelligence community each year. It is similar to the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) which outlines the military budget for the coming year, but deals specifically with the budget for three letter agencies such as CIA, NSA, FBI.
Above is the direct link to the legislation. Below I've copied and pasted the items relevant to nanotechnology:
TITLE V—MATTERS PERTAINING TO UNITED STATES ECONOMIC AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPETITION WITH UNITED STATES ADVERSARIES
Subtitle B—Next-Generation Energy, Biotechnology, And Artificial Intelligence
Sec. 515. Strategy for submittal of notice by private persons to Federal agencies regarding certain risks and threats relating to artificial intelligence.
(3) The advanced capabilities of the systems described in paragraph (1), and their accessibility to a wide range of users, have increased the likelihood and effect of misuse or malfunction of these systems, such as to generate synthetic media for disinformation campaigns, develop or refine malware for computer network exploitation activity, 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩 𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥-𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐬, 𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦𝐬, enhance surveillance capabilities in ways that undermine the privacy of citizens of the United States, and increase the risk of exploitation or malfunction of information technology systems incorporating artificial intelligence systems in mission-critical fields such as health care, critical infrastructure, and transportation.
(b) Strategy Required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall establish a strategy by which vendors and commercial users of artificial intelligence systems, as well as independent researchers and other third parties, may effectively notify appropriate elements of the United States Government of—
The bill then goes on to specify upcoming whistleblower protections and a plan to restructure the classification system to make it easier to declassify certain documents. If you have been following other news related to the military budget and the NDAA for 2023, there was similar language for whistleblower protections related to the UAP issue, and within months of that bill being passed, we had dozens of whistleblowers come forward and there was a Congressional hearing in July featuring 3 whistleblowers on the UAP issue. Now we are seeing the language that was used in the 2023 NDAA being mirrored in the 2024 intelligence authorization act. This pattern indicates that there will be whistleblowers coming forward in 2024 regarding biosecurity and artificial intelligence in what to me looks to be references to the jab.
I'm surprised that no one in the alternative media seems aware of or is discussing this legislation. I've shared this information with people like Sasha Latypova, Joseph Sansone, and others in a position to use the information effectively.
Text - S.2103 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): Intelligence Authorization
Thanks for the reply, Robert. The only info I have is from the bill itself. I merely went to the trouble of reading the bill. I'm shocked that I haven't been able to find any commentary anywhere on the internet about the language in this bill. We need lawyers and people with legal/legislative experience to take a closer look at the bill to decipher what it means. Right now I'm just trying to get this bill in front of more eyes.
Thank you! I do think the media silence on this issue is very strange. When provisions for whistleblowers was outlined for the 2023 NDAA, there was plenty of alternative media coverage and the people who followed the UAP issue knew to expect big things this year. And ultimately a lot of whistleblowers came forward and a few testified in front of Congress this year, and even bigger events are coming next year. I find it a bit strange that the same people who analyze the NDAA don't also analyze the Intelligence Authorization Act. They're interrelated. I don't know whether the nanoparticles and nanotech in the jabs have anything to do with the UAP issue, but the thing they have in common is secrecy and lack of media coverage. And whistleblowers, apparently.
WOW!!! Thank you soooo much for your help and for being on top of this with Dr. Sansone. Blessings from a Canadian who LOVES Florida!
Joe always says… “We either win, or we die… So we’ll win”. ■ Amen, Amen. M
Thank you.
Mr. Sansone et al, I wanted to bring something to your attention. It appears that there will be whistleblowers from within the intelligence community coming forward to expose the nanotech in the shots in 2024.
There is some very revealing language in the Intelligence Authorization Act for 2024. It's the legislation that finalizes the budget for the U.S. intelligence community each year. It is similar to the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) which outlines the military budget for the coming year, but deals specifically with the budget for three letter agencies such as CIA, NSA, FBI.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2103/text
Above is the direct link to the legislation. Below I've copied and pasted the items relevant to nanotechnology:
TITLE V—MATTERS PERTAINING TO UNITED STATES ECONOMIC AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPETITION WITH UNITED STATES ADVERSARIES
Subtitle B—Next-Generation Energy, Biotechnology, And Artificial Intelligence
Sec. 515. Strategy for submittal of notice by private persons to Federal agencies regarding certain risks and threats relating to artificial intelligence.
(3) The advanced capabilities of the systems described in paragraph (1), and their accessibility to a wide range of users, have increased the likelihood and effect of misuse or malfunction of these systems, such as to generate synthetic media for disinformation campaigns, develop or refine malware for computer network exploitation activity, 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩 𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥-𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐬, 𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦𝐬, enhance surveillance capabilities in ways that undermine the privacy of citizens of the United States, and increase the risk of exploitation or malfunction of information technology systems incorporating artificial intelligence systems in mission-critical fields such as health care, critical infrastructure, and transportation.
(b) Strategy Required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall establish a strategy by which vendors and commercial users of artificial intelligence systems, as well as independent researchers and other third parties, may effectively notify appropriate elements of the United States Government of—
(𝟑) 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤𝐬 𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐬, 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧, 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩, 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥-𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐬, 𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦𝐬;
The bill then goes on to specify upcoming whistleblower protections and a plan to restructure the classification system to make it easier to declassify certain documents. If you have been following other news related to the military budget and the NDAA for 2023, there was similar language for whistleblower protections related to the UAP issue, and within months of that bill being passed, we had dozens of whistleblowers come forward and there was a Congressional hearing in July featuring 3 whistleblowers on the UAP issue. Now we are seeing the language that was used in the 2023 NDAA being mirrored in the 2024 intelligence authorization act. This pattern indicates that there will be whistleblowers coming forward in 2024 regarding biosecurity and artificial intelligence in what to me looks to be references to the jab.
I'm surprised that no one in the alternative media seems aware of or is discussing this legislation. I've shared this information with people like Sasha Latypova, Joseph Sansone, and others in a position to use the information effectively.
Text - S.2103 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): Intelligence Authorization
I'm going to look into this more. I'm also going to email you direct from rino..., to get more info.
Thanks for the reply, Robert. The only info I have is from the bill itself. I merely went to the trouble of reading the bill. I'm shocked that I haven't been able to find any commentary anywhere on the internet about the language in this bill. We need lawyers and people with legal/legislative experience to take a closer look at the bill to decipher what it means. Right now I'm just trying to get this bill in front of more eyes.
I forwarded this to Dr. Sansone, who is forwarding it to David Meiswinkle at nationalarm.org
I think we all need to look into this much deeper.
Thank you! I do think the media silence on this issue is very strange. When provisions for whistleblowers was outlined for the 2023 NDAA, there was plenty of alternative media coverage and the people who followed the UAP issue knew to expect big things this year. And ultimately a lot of whistleblowers came forward and a few testified in front of Congress this year, and even bigger events are coming next year. I find it a bit strange that the same people who analyze the NDAA don't also analyze the Intelligence Authorization Act. They're interrelated. I don't know whether the nanoparticles and nanotech in the jabs have anything to do with the UAP issue, but the thing they have in common is secrecy and lack of media coverage. And whistleblowers, apparently.
If nothing else, you all are aware of it now. There may be little else to do but wait and see what happens.